Cybersecurity Audit and Assessment
Remain compliant and retain stakeholder trust.
Flame Tree supports organisations to meet cybersecurity, privacy and AI obligations. Our cybersecurity audits and assessments are risk-based and evidence-led. We assess what is relevant to your environment rather than relying on generic checklists.
We provide assurance across controls, documentation and operational practice. This supports audit committees, boards, executives and delivery teams. It also supports procurement and vendor assurance processes.
Ongoing assurance with our tailored monthly plan
Many organisations require continuous assurance rather than annual reporting. Our monthly support can include ongoing control testing, evidence guidance and progress tracking. This provides a consistent cadence for compliance and stakeholder reporting.
We also support remediation follow-up, we track actions with accountable owners to agreed timeframes. This keeps audit outcomes progressing.
Common engagement types
Internal audits and certification readiness reviews. Independent assessments for boards, regulators, insurers and customers. Targeted reviews following system changes, new suppliers or organisational change.
We also support completion of security questionnaires. Questions are mapped to an agreed control set and an evidence library is maintained so responses remain accurate and consistent.
Our approach
Maintain compliance and stakeholder confidence through structured audits and assessments
Flame Tree takes a risk-based approach to cybersecurity audits and assessments with solutions tailored to organisation-specific challenges.
You receive defined scope, agreed criteria and structured outputs. We outline what is being tested and the reason for testing. Findings are prioritised by risk and mapped to agreed frameworks or obligations.
Audits are delivered in context. Controls are assessed within your operating model, including cloud and managed services. Evidence requests are planned and consolidated so teams can respond efficiently.
ISO 27001 audits and readiness assessments
We audit and assess your ISMS against ISO 27001 requirements, including management system clauses and selected Annex A controls. Our reports support internal audit, certification readiness and surveillance activities.
IRAP assessments
We provide IRAP assessment aligned with the Australian Government ISM. This supports secure government information handling and informed system assurance decisions. Reporting is structured for governance review and remediation planning.
CMMC readiness
We support readiness for CMMC requirements for organisations working within US defence supply chains. Focus areas include scope definition, control mapping, evidence preparation and remediation planning. This supports procurement and customer assurance requirements.
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 assessments
We assess maturity against NIST CSF 2.0 functions and outcomes. This provides a structured view of current and target state. Our reports and findings can support you to design and structure initiatives that demonstrably improve your cybersecurity posture and operations.
Essential Eight assessments
We assess Essential Eight maturity and provide a practical uplift plan. Findings are mapped to your target maturity level and operating constraints. This supports defensible reporting and prioritised remediation.
Our Accreditations and Certifications
Don’t just meet requirements –
lead with confidence
Work with us to take a proactive, strategic approach to cybersecurity that not only meets compliance standards but also strengthens your defences, builds trust and supports long-term resilience.
Let’s future-proof your organisation, starting today.
FAQs
What is the difference between an audit and an assessment?
An audit tests performance against defined criteria and records formal findings. An assessment reviews posture and maturity against a framework. Both support assurance depending on scope and evidence depth.
Why is a risk-based approach better than a checklist approach to compliance?
A risk-based approach focuses on the actual threats and vulnerabilities your organisation faces, enabling more meaningful protection, especially when standard controls aren’t practical or effective in your environment.
What do you need from us to start?
A short chat covering scope, systems and stakeholders. Access to relevant policies, architecture documentation and control evidence. Time with system owners for focused interviews.
How do you manage evidence requests without slowing teams down?
We develop an evidence plan aligned to the selected framework. Requests are batched and prioritised. Evidence is reused across overlapping standards where appropriate.
How often should we conduct cybersecurity assessments or audits?
Ideally, assessments should be conducted at least annually, or more frequently when major changes occur, including when there are new systems, suppliers or regulations. Continuous monitoring or retainer-based models can provide even greater assurance on an ongoing basis.
How does cybersecurity assurance support board and executive-level decision making?
Assurance gives leadership clear, evidence-based insights into cybersecurity performance and risk. This transparency helps with strategic decision-making, regulatory reporting and maintaining trust with customers and investors.
Can cybersecurity assurance be tailored to my industry or business models?
Absolutely. Every sector has unique challenges—whether it’s education, healthcare, finance or critical infrastructure. A good assurance program adapts to your specific environment, aligning with relevant risks, compliance needs and operational realities.